Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


One of my goals for the new year is to dump cable TV. I lived without it for three years in SF--I decided it was not worth the money after Angel was cancelled, because I wasn't watching any new shows at the time and had only had it for the picture quality. Living no-cable did become a bit of an issue when I started getting into Lost, because I couldn't get ABC on the rabbit ears, unlike other local channels.

Now, I just don't watch that many shows, and I have Google TV and streaming video, so I can watch things without needing cable (only downside, no closed captioning, but that should be changing), and it would still be less money than I am paying in a monthly cable bill.

But here's the trick: I also use cable for internet at the moment, and I ain't giving up my internet. So I need to find an internet provider that isn't connected to cable or satellite TV. So what do people suggest? Is Century Link any good? Is there an alternative that isn't cable, satellite, or DSL, or do I need to pretty much go DSL? And if I do, I do *not* want to pay for a land line I won't use. Me and my cell phone get by pretty well.

Thanks, all.



Dec. 2nd, 2012 05:23 am (UTC)
I don't know if you can get a DSL without a land line (in some areas I think you can). I can tell you verizon broadband sucks and you COULD NOT stream those videos because they'll run you right over your monthly limit and the fees are outrageous.

Satellite is expensive and out here a lot of us have it and I've heard nothing good about it at all.

I would kill to get cable internet or DSL
Dec. 2nd, 2012 03:02 pm (UTC)
No satellite, unless it's internet only and no TV. Satellite has even *more* pointless channels I wouldn't watch.

I could deal with a useless land line I don't use as long as it's not overpriced and some fancy digital option thing I'm spending money on and again...not using.
Dec. 2nd, 2012 05:34 pm (UTC)
Hughes net is internet only, it's very expensive, it's even more expensive to disconnect, they slow the speed down if you use too much and half the time it's just plain out (like I said, a lot of people have it here I know how bad it is)

that i don't know. I know AT&T would put in a "dry dsl" which meant no phone but since cell phones doesn't work here half the time and they are MORE money than having a land line I didn't try that but you might find that a useful option. It just won't be as fast as cable. However, I have streamed video on my parents dsl so that shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Dec. 2nd, 2012 05:39 pm (UTC)
I am currently using AT&T as my cell provider. I have heard awful things about them lately, but haven't had a bad experience myself. Probably because I have a "dumb phone"--it only makes calls, doesn't text or use apps or anything else.

Considered DSL w/ them for internet. But not if they're reputation w/ it is bad.
Dec. 2nd, 2012 06:08 pm (UTC)
I can't answer that. I can only tell you verizon is horrible in every aspect known to man be it phone or broadband (they're so bad they've had to give my cousin three free phones just to keep her after all the hassle they've given her and you routinely see what they do to me with their internet service)
Dec. 2nd, 2012 06:18 pm (UTC)