 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
So I have seen the new Trek movie. With my flist abounding with spoilers and rave reviews, and me needing to de-friend trekicons that I've belonged to since I joined LJ, it seemed a good idea. Plus, yesterday I managed to fiddle with my computer keyboard until I found the culprit causing the typing problem I was having, so I fixed that (for now), and could cancel my Genius Bar appointment allowing me to go to an early morning matinee. So, to make a long story less long, I liked it. I am, of course, not without my issues. ( movie spoilers )Tags: movies, philosophical musings, trek mood: thoughtful
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
While looking at this on Amazon: Lost and Philosophy: The Island Has Its ReasonsI was reminded of this: Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in SunnydaleWhich lead me to doing a quick search, leading to titles like this, which leave one pondering (or, at the least, WTFing): Bob Dylan and Philosophy Hitchcock and Philosophy iPod and Philosophy Pink Floyd and Philosophy Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy Star Wars and Philosophy The Beatles and Philosophy The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy The Philosophy of TV Noir The Philosophy of the X-FilesBecause really, if you're going to write a philosophy and pop culture book, you need a catchy subtitle: 24 and Philosophy: The World According to Jack Batman and Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy: Knowledge Here Begins Out There Family Guy and Philosophy: A Cure for the Petarded Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! The Matrix and Philosophy: Welcome to the Desert of the Real More Matrix and Philosophy: Revolutions and Reloaded Decoded Seinfeld and Philosophy: A Book about Everything and Nothing South Park and Philosophy: You Know, I Learned Something Today South Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating Star Trek and Philosophy: The Wrath of Kant Steven Spielberg and Philosophy: We're Gonna Need a Bigger Book Superheroes and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy: The Lion, the Witch, and the Worldview The Lord of the Rings and Philosophy: One Book to Rule Them All The Office and Philosophy: Scenes from the Unexamined Life The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer The Sopranos and Philosophy: I Kill Therefore I Am The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless U2 and Philosophy: How to Decipher an Atomic BandTags: philosophical musings mood: amused
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
And of course, I had to get all philosophical about it..... I don't do "favorites" memes because they flummox me. Don't ask me my favorite book, film, actress, actor, band, artist, or song. I can't choose among the ones that I like and I'll spend hours wringing my hands thinking I *need* to figure it out because other people seem to be able to list their favorites with such ease. So I'm only ganking one of the memes I see going around. It's either that or start working on a new version of the Patient Event Timeline stored procedure, and it's too late in the day to do that. So, ganked from cornerofmadnessTotal number of fandoms I like: I have no idea. Sheesh, what a question. It assumes one can define "fandom" to begin with. Is it more than just watching the show/reading the books/seeing the films? Does it necessitate talking to other people about it (a) at all or (b) in other than a casual conversation at the water cooler? Does it necessitate reading/seeing/writing tie-in materials? Does it necessitate deep enthusiasm or just respect? *boggles* My first fandom ever: Original Star Trek, in early '70's syndication. I didn't do public fandom stuff, I was just a little kid, but I watched all the episodes and later bought U.S.S. Enterprise blueprint/episode guide books and read some of the novel tie-ins until I figured out they could be contradicted by the films. I called myself a "Trekkie" (and no, not a "Trekker"). My most recent fandom: The L-Word, maybe? Again, I guess that depends on what you mean by "fandom". I like talking about the show with friends, introducing people to the show who haven't had the chance to see it. Five fandoms that mean a lot to me: Star Trek (original *and* later series, esp DS9), BtVS (the show that introduced me to on-line fandom), AtS (the show I can't get out of my system), Harry Potter (just very cool), L Word. Fandoms or not fandoms: I don't really talk to anyone about my interest in Highlander, Star Wars, or Anne Rice. But the first two of those in particular are very important to me. Are they not fandoms if I don't talk about them much to other people? Tags: lost, philosophical musings, tv mood: thoughtful
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 O.K., so I have a personal ad on-line, and it includes, among other things, several pictures of me, including this one (*points at icon*), which was part of my application to join the LJ community 2hot4philosophy. I am depicted there with Nietzsche's "The Genealogy of Morals" in hand. Anyway, in the particular on-line personals site where I have my ad, they have a long list of items with little check boxes you are supposed to click as "turn-ons" and "turn-offs". One of them is "power". I clicked "turn off" because, well, I don't like being bossed around. At all. And I'm not particularly into bossing. But, so anyway, to make a long story less long, I get an intriguing response to my ad this morning which consists of nothing else but the observation, "that intrigues me: an image of you with the geneology of morals--with power listed as a 'turn-off.' Do tell me more." I'm trying to think of what to say back that will also intrigue (you know, as opposed to the boring true story above) I guess the first question is, why did I pick my one and only Nietzsche book for my 2hot photo session, besides to be intriguingly enigmatic? Question to fellow 2hot members: is it kosher to x-post this to 2hot4philosophy?? Tags: dating, philosophical musings mood: puzzled
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
This is a potential topic for my website, and I'm thinking about it because ljash said something interesting under one of my posts (I'm not going to link to it because it's in the spoiler post from last Friday): ( spoilers from AtS 5.17 & 5.19 )PS. I'm thinking about posting this on ATPo, but I'm thinking it's already the topic of several threads that I haven't read all the way through. Would it be redundant? ** dlgood, it occurs to me that this might be the reason Buffy displays such a puzzling stubborness in "The Gift" we were talking about, e.g., not even being willing to say she would kill Dawn even if she was ultimately not asked to do so in the episode. In ME's "no compromise" model of the hero, the true hero would never even say they'd be anything less than heroic, much less do it. Or, in another example, it takes the slightly-less-heroic/more pragmatic hero (Giles) to kill Ben in that ep because Buffy refuses to compromise on her values. Tags: angel, philosophical musings mood: energetic
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |










 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
OK, I'm half way through "Chamber of Secrets" and, yes, I'll admit it: I am now a fan. But is this a surprise? Not to me. The books are better than the movies, charming and entertaining and almost a perfect fit for the kind of fiction I look for: sci-fi or fantasy that takes place in our world, but reveals a secret segment of our world no ordinary person knows about (BtVS/Angel and Highlander are both like this). And it's a series, so that when I get that "so what happened next?" bug I can just pick up the next book. Or wait for the next book. And of course, I like books with complicated teen-aged protagonists/heroes. Don't ask me why. Connor Angel, John Connor, Luke Skywalker, Buffy Summers, Richie Ryan, Harry Potter. Rowling has created a rich complex sub-culture/universe that, only half-way into the second book, rivals a full 11 seasons of BtVS and Angel. To crawl around in this woman's mind! I knew I was merrily in fandom land when I found myself looking for Harry Potter websites that resembled the Metaphysics section of my own ATPoBtVS. If I hadn't come across a clever and decent little reference site on my first search, I would have had to wrestle my inner metaphysician to the ground to keep her from starting a new website, All Things Philosophical in... well, you know. I came to Harry Potter through the movies, so that might make me sympathetic to the movies, but I actually find it fascinating to compare the books and the movies. I'm the sort of person who enjoys the writer's and director's commentaries on movie and television show DVDs almost more than the original piece. It's interesting to see where the movie-makers cut corners, what they decide to chop out, what they decide to keep, and where they decide to make events go completely differently than the books in order to save time and resources. But this is why the written word will never be replaced by film. The written word can go more places, and people are willing to give it more time than they'll sit through a film. Rowling has given a fresh face to classic fantasy themes: the unwanted child, discovering a magical new world right under your nose, good versus evil, the mundane/poor/outsider kids vs. the popular/rich/insider kids, secret passageways, mystical animals, bubbling potions, spells, rituals, monsters, super powers, and the panged, panged pains of childhood/adolescence. Now I will just have to find a way to deal with the fact that I like something that is immensely.... dare I use the word? Ugh! Popular. shudders Instead of people staring oddly at the front cover of the book I am reading on the bus, they smile nostalgically. I am not used to this. I'm so used to doing what comes naturally to me and finding myself the odd girl out. Tags: harry potter, philosophical musings mood: enthralled
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |